Re: [lojban] Who needs the LLG?

[Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>]

I think it's a misunderstanding. Did he mean BPFK?

2014-05-23 13:54 GMT+04:00 v4hn <me@v4hn.de>:

Good morning everyone,

last night I visited the #balningau channel
and quickly got into an argument with ldlework.

Basically, his position is the following:

- The LLG (which no one in this ninjbo movement ever attended as far as I know)
  is obsolete and lojban doesn't need it anymore
- Annual meetings make no sense because issues in lojban
  arise more dynamically and should be resolved, also by
  changing the language officially, by a dynamic group
  of people instead of a committee - for the final act of making
  the change official one person is enough (see next item)
- It's much better to use the "benevolent dictator" principle
  on all levels (this includes decisions of the LLG)

This is a rather more radical perspective than the latest
"leadership" debate, so I thought someone might wants to
comment on this.


v4hn

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.