[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Who needs the LLG?

To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Who needs the LLG?
From: v4hn <me@v4hn.de>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 12:04:39 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=RJjtKcTZSsjV3xx50RbasTmw0RTLsOdnR2+i5Oms/og=; b=qpDd4FSJC8VenRSwCJeUCy+yAWUqrENtJPh0X6XHZQapzF9qGd9up792iMyGZW+M9m p4SQQ2VyEk+iYnbMTiHaItlQMUxQ0mdQWdtfcnAR/S0jJHNaQL3xCIDYi06KVHO1DJjH Qx5sBMSef4OQWQKftXgAAlrtQA+dYonUOr7CtE22pTvOhe1Z+Hnt+70vkSGyo3hN+asJ NCY5wNwwsEL1q0H1IL5YYwARV5BQXxbTm/bLr1DXtLqWSi0F0Oc8ILphxofqdhBwdtEn 30lnsAxwNrjwy4nGt3AgfoXEDgh96ikWy3M00pvSO88R28ttw+JjGpZYD4hLgvTfOdVS MKVA==
In-reply-to: <CAO7bV+jjjUBuGo8C6jMKVxi8ECq8RY=LJP00vmqMh6JO6dsrpw@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <20140523095407.GU19511@samsa.fritz.box> <CAO7bV+jjjUBuGo8C6jMKVxi8ECq8RY=LJP00vmqMh6JO6dsrpw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 01:55:43PM +0400, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:
> I think it's a misunderstanding. Did he mean BPFK?

Not as far as I understood him. He explicitly stated that
(at least) he is not at all interested in attending an LLG meeting
and considers them to rigid w.r.t. language changes.


v4hn

Attachment: pgpfmPCGh9lhw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Who needs the LLG?
  - From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Who needs the LLG?
  - From: Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>

References:
- [lojban] Who needs the LLG?
  - From: v4hn <me@v4hn.de>
- Re: [lojban] Who needs the LLG?
  - From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Who needs the LLG?
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Who needs the LLG?
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] Who needs the LLG?
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Who needs the LLG?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread