[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] guheks and geks for operators



as was just discovered in the chat:

http://dag.github.io/cll/14/17/
----
The basic components of mekso are operands, like “2”, and operators, like “+”.
...
Operands are connected in afterthought with eks and in forethought with geks, just like sumti. Operators, on the other hand, are connected in afterthought with jeks and in forethought with guheks, just like tanru components. (However, jeks and joiks with “bo” are not allowed for operators.) This parallelism is no accident.
...
17.4)  li re ge su'i gi pi'i re du li vo
       The-number two both plus and times two equals the-number four.
       Both 2 + 2 = 4 and 2 x 2 = 4.
----

Example 17.4) contradicts what is stated before. It is not parsed neither by http://www.lojban.org/jboski
nor by http://camxes.lojban.org

However, if we change it to 
17.4)  li re gu'e su'i gi pi'i re du li vo [boi]

then it would parse (if we add {boi} for jboski)

Is it an error in CLL? Has it been already described?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.