Re: [lojban] guheks and geks for operators

[Zsbán Ambrus <ambrus@math.bme.hu>]

On 5/21/14, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://dag.github.io/cll/14/17/
> ----
> Example 17.4) contradicts what is stated before. It is not parsed
>
> Is it an error in CLL? Has it been already described?

There's more where this came from.  In chapter 18, see

http://dag.github.io/cll/18/17/

This repeats the same mistake in example 17.5.  That example too
should use {gu'e} instead of {ge} because it tries to connect mekso
operators.

Further, in the same page, the English translation of 17.6 is missing
the division bar, also "then x = " should be vertically aligned with
the division bar rather that with the numerator.  This is probably a
formatting problem that got created during conversion.

--
mi'e .ionac.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.