On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:26:10 PM UTC-4, And Rosta wrote:
TR NS, On 16/09/2014 22:36:
> On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 1:39:34 PM UTC-4, lojbab wrote:
> Look at guaspi and Voksigid for prior efforts to
> reconsider Lojban.
>
>
> I have looked at those. Any tonal language (IMHO) is doomed from the
> get go. Voksigid had some good ideas, but never really got off the
> ground. And I have looked an many many more.
Many many more of what? Efforts to reconsider Lojban? Even if you broaden that to include loglangs in general, are there actually many many more, rather than merely a very few more?
I just meant many conlangs. But you're right, given the context, I should have limited it to loglangs, which would be a few more.