[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Speaker specificity: {.i da'i na vajni}



On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:40 AM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:

On further consideration, I agree it's not useless. But

(1) For every relative, noi, poi, ne, pe, no'u, po'u (that list from memory -- hope it's right) a nonveridical counterpart would be at least as useful as voi--poi is.

There's also "po" and "po'e", with no non-restrictive counterparts. Neither of them is used much, and when "po'e" is used, it can almost always be more perspicuously replaced by "be", since it's usually things like "lo xance po'e ko'a" instead of "lo xance be ko'a".  "ne" is also not used much.)

I suppose a nonveridical version of "no'u" (which is short for "noi ke'a du", would be short for "noi ke'a kinda"? 

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.