Re: [lojban] {le} as an anaphorical particle

[Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>]

2014-09-30 17:46 GMT+04:00 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

It is in no way a proposal but just a thought mildly based on former usage

http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=%27%27%27le%27%27%27_as_an_anaphorical_particle

Why "ka'e"? In:

  la djan cu cusku zo coi la meris .i le cusku cu gleki

do you want "le cusku" to refer to la meris, since la meris ka'e cusku?

lo nu pilno lo misno rarbau would tell me that probably selbri should have precedence over sumti. but the proposal is not yet fully formalised. if you have any thoughts to complete it please do.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

   

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.