Still confused about what {clakufa} is.
So, I'm going to try to construct the first sentence of the theory, which is "Let R be an open rectangle centered at (a,b) with length L and height H in which f(x,y) is smooth."
I believe {va'o} would be useful here, but the definition doesn't make a lot of sense to me
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:21:08 AM UTC-4, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 05:12:29 Romaji #### wrote:
> two questions
>
> 1. does that show the precise mathematical concept as a sumti?
> 2. How would that be broken down in English? Or with split lujivo?
It's a selbri. To get a sumti, precede it with an article.
{kortolvau} is a lujvo of {korbi to'e vasru}, "boundary opposite-of
containing". Substituting the other members of NAhE or zero we get:
korvau: x1 is closed
korbi zei je'a zei vasru ({je'a} has no rafsi): x1 is indeed closed
kornalvau: x1 is not closed
kornorvau: x1 is neither closed nor open
and there are two experimental cmavo in the selma'o, which I'll ignore. This
leaves "not open" and "clopen", which are {na'e kortolvau} and, I guess, {to'e
kornorvau}. Another possibility for "clopen" is {korcau}, "lacking a
boundary". Sets that consist entirely of boundary, such as the Julia set of i,
could be called {nercau}.
Pierre
--
Don't buy a French car in Holland. It may be a citroen.