Salience is not a logical notion, though it enters in to this discussion at some Gricean level. But so far as logic goes, {lo} is just a function that returns an object from its range, the complex built on the extension of the assigned predicate (a node in the upward semilattice of among applied to the closure of the extension under part, according to the last guess I saw). It has no special properties, in other words, like uniqueness or specificity or .... . It has no logic of its own, as up and down do, though it may on occasion mimic at least down (some would say up, too, by I am unconvinced). Sent from my iPad -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |