Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

2014-10-11 20:34 GMT+04:00 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:

Or perhaps we need to reevaluate the definition of some of these LAhEs. I wouldn't mind for example making "lu'i A .e B" the set of those things that are both among A and among B, which would require redefining "lu'i" as "lo selcmi be ro me", with three potential scope levels just as "tu'a" has, and with the minimum being the correct one.

Sorry for intervening but what are the three levels of {tu'a}? Could you please illustrate them via an example? 

      mi djica tu'a ci da

      [level 1 zo'u] mi djica lo po'i [level 2 zo'u] ke'a du'u [level 3 zo'u] mi djica da

The correct placement of "ci da", as we usually understand it, is in level 3.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.