Re: [lojban] "to" and "from" places in vorme, dargu, cripu, klaji

[iesk <pa.fae@gmx.de>]

.i la gleki ku cusku di'e
>When using cripu3/4 we can't even be sure where is destination due to "typically".
>
>And most bridges are two way bridges. Using cripu place structure looks like a nightmare here
>[…]

I understand

>x1 is a bridge/span over/across x2 between x3 and x4 [unordered, typically destination first].

thusly: {cripu}ing means spanning over x2, objectively connecting x2 and x4, and that’s it. While which one is considered a starting point and which one a destination—if you imagine crossing the x2 via what {cripu}es it—is obviously subjective, depending on ma kau klama ma kau ma kau lo bi'u nai cripu. I take the stuff in square brackets as a mere comment on usage as observed, expected, or recommended at the time of the compiling of the gi'uste, not as part of the definition.

I guess it would be highly impractical if {cripu} were to have places corresponding to {klama}2 and {klama}3, since it doesn’t have a {klama}1 equivalent to clarify the perspective.

mu'o mi'e la iesko

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.