Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:

* Saturday, 2014-11-08 at 11:40 -0300 - Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:

> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > In {mi nelci ko'a ne semau ko'e} isn't {ne semau} always expanded into
> > {noi ke'a no'a semau ko'e}?
>
> It's more like: "noi ke'a zmadu ko'e lo ka no'a xi pa".

Such rules involving {no'a} don't work for most BAI, though, so either
this is part of the definition of {mau} or (I think preferably) it's
just an obvious devaguing of {noi ke'a co'e se mau ko'e}.

I agree, yes. I'd say the latter. We can concoct contrived examples where "ko'a" is the property zmadu3 rather than the zmadu1 that ko'e is being compared with.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.