In {mi nelci ko'a ne semau ko'e} isn't {ne semau} always expanded into {noi ke'a no'a semau ko'e}?
Yes, of course, that's what I meant. Change "lo nu broda" to "la'e di'u" if you prefer, or a more precise reference to the event described by the first "broda".isnt' la'edi'u refer to the previous utterance, not to the immediately preceding main clause?