ba gi broda gi zajba == broda .i ba bo zajba
bai gi broda gi zajba == zajba .i bai bo broda
Which reminds me - which way should
broda .i ba je bai bo zajba
work, or should it be some mix? If a mix, how about with {joi}?
> I think it might also make sense to analyse tag-connectives as if they were
> ordinary tags on the second connectand, with the first connectand acting as
> their complement, so:
>
> broda .i [jek tag] bo brode
> -> broda .i [jek] brode [(se} tag] lo nu broda
But if broda doesn't occur, what is {lo nu broda} referring to here?