[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] {jai jai} and {fai}



On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

Well, I meant for moving {fai} inwards. {ke} doesnt work as {faixipa}.

 ({jai <ke [jai ri'a broda] KE'E>} {<fai do> VAU})

Neither {be} is able to move it inwards:
({<jai [jai ri'a broda]> <be [fai do] BE'O>} VAU)

You need both ke and be:

jai ke jai ri'a broda be fai do ke'e fai mi 

As for {faixipa} why do we start counting with {pa} from the inside, not from the outside}?

I would start with "no" from the outside.
 
And the current parsers currently don't provide inner links of what links what, they dont provide enough formalization. Compare this with FA where jbofi'e clearly understands which sumti fills which place of which bridi within the tree.

That's what Martin is working on. It's hard.

mu'o mi'e xorxes
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.