[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Questions about Lojban



On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

How can {lo se xi vei pa a re no'a} be monoparsed in pragmatic terms? It still has two readings.

It has a single parse. One that involves a disjunction.
 
{mi prami do} still has zillions of readings including {mi ba'o prami do} and {mi ba zu ze'i ru'i prami do}.

Not really, it only expresses the relation "prami" between two arguments "mi" and "do", basically P{m,d) in FOPL notation. There's no syntactic ambiguity. The wikipedia article on ambiguity discusses the distinction between ambiguity and vagueness, as well as different types of ambiguity: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.