[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] the myth of monoparsing



2015-02-07 15:45 GMT+03:00 v4hn <me@v4hn.de>:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 09:23:38AM +0300, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:
> Sorry but if you don't understand Lojban then ... why all this discussion here?
> I was trying to show how Lojban parsers deal with another level of analysing text.

Because And tried to make sense out of your trollish explanation w.r.t. English.

This explanation wasn't trollish. I truly believe that there is some misunderstanding of how English text can be parsed, namely, that clauses should not be necessarily attached to explicitly defined heads. Imprecise numbers like {mo'e zo'e} could be used for parsing English as well.

And if And can't read Lojban sentences then a true comparison between parsers for the two languages can't be made.

Is there anything more simple?
To talk about a subject one needs to be familiar with this subject.

Otherwise this reminds of "200 words for snow in Inuktitut".

 

As this failed, I don't see any sense in further contributions to this thread..

That someone disagrees with you doesn't immediately mean he is not right.

 


v4hn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.