[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Questions about Lojban




On 7 Feb 2015 06:26, "Gleki Arxokuna" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2015-02-06 22:28 GMT+03:00 And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Your belief that monoparsing is a myth seems to be intimately bound up with a deeply eccentric theory of English syntax that bravely discards the work of all syntacticians who have preceded you. I am not yet persuaded to abandon the current paradigm and embrace your new one.
>
>
> When did I say that monoparsing is a myth in general?

Most prominently in titling the thread "The myth of monoparsing".

>
> I said "Since the original post on monoparsing as something unique or defining feature of Lojban provided no examples on how this monoparsing differs from English "

Fine, but the sentences of mine that you quoted above still apply to your belief that monoparsing is not distinctive to Lojban but is shared with natlangs.

--And.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.