Re: [lojban] BPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Non-logical+Connectives

mi joi ry. ze'a casnu lo lijda ctuca tadji

Me and R have been discussing religious teaching methods.

  No, because lo casnu is specifically defined as being a mass, which "joi" creates

 

Isn't this example wrong?

What about the other two examples? Shouldn't {jo'u} or {ce} work better here:

la .djan. joi la .pitr. cu re mei

John and Peter are two.

  Again, no, because lo remei is defined as a mass.  You could use ce to make lo se remei, though.  And I believe that la djan jo'u la pitr would actually be two pamei, not a remei

 

la jegvon cu cevni le xriso joi le xebro joi le muslo

Jehovah is the god of the Christians, the Jews and the Muslims.

  You could use jo'u here, yes.

             --gejyspa

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.