|
Correction: On 12/02/2015 17:24, Ilmen wrote:
But I guess that a true (and useful) parse analysis should not allow more than two branches per node, so that for each word we know what other word it attaches to. As the -ing verb-form can either represent an adjectival present-participle (which attaches to a noun on its left) or an adverbial present-participle (which attaches to the verb, I think), it's not possible to produce a single *binary* parse tree.(Sorry, I've written "adjectival" twice whereas I meant "adverbial" at the second occurrence of "adjectival".) .u'u mi'e la .ilmen. mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |