On 06/01/2015 12:43 AM, Spheniscine (la zipcpi) wrote:
Seems odd that {fanza} doesn't have a place for how or by what aspect {lo fanza} is annoying {lo se fanza}.
I use {ka}-abstractions in fanza1 as a property of fanza2, the rationale being that you can't be annoying by things that you don't experience in some way.
Hence, if a sound is annoying you (as you listen to it, for instance), then you can write {.i tu'a lo sance cu fanza mi} or more precisely {.i lo ka ce'u tirna lo sance cu fanza mi}.
This also constitutes a good use case for {jai}: .i lo sance cu jai fanza mi
.i mi'e la tsani mu'o