I agree.
ex.1)
ro da
poi su'o de
poi ro di zo'u di broda de da
zo'u de brode da di
zo'u da brodi de di
Do we have a rule to unify {zo'u}s nested in {poi}? Maybe the preceding ones are outer, but I have never seen the rule written.
ex.2)
ro da
poi su'o de zo'u de broda da
zi'e poi ro di zo'u di brode da
zo'u da brodi de di
Do we have a rule to unify {zo'u}s in {poi} connected with {zi'e}? Maybe we can define the preceding ones are outer. If so, ex.2 seems apparently the same with
ex.2-1)
ro da
poi ro di zo'u di brode da
zi'e poi su'o de zo'u de broda da
zo'u da brodi de di
but actually they will have different meaning.
ex.3)
su'o de zo'u ko'a poi ro da zo'u da broda ke'a cu brode de
When {zo'u} in {poi} is covered with a constant {ko'a}, is it considered outer than {su'o de} or inner?