Mail Index

• Thread Index

• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: la durka <durka42@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Jacob Thomas Errington <tsani@mail.jerrington.me>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Jacob Thomas Errington <tsani@mail.jerrington.me>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: An attempt to explain why "ganai broda gi ko brode" makes sense
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Jacob Thomas Errington <tsani@mail.jerrington.me>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Lojban pronuncation
  • From: Leo Beltran <leobeltran@mail.com>
• [lojban] Re: Lojban pronuncation
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] {nai} vs {ne'e}: simple vs polar negation
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Lojban pronuncation
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
• Re: [lojban] Lojban pronuncation
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] {nai} vs {ne'e}: simple vs polar negation
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Lojban pronuncation
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
• [lojban] CLL help: add jbovlaste words
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: [lojban] CLL help: add jbovlaste words
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] CLL help: add jbovlaste words
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] CLL help: add jbovlaste words
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] CLL help: add jbovlaste words
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Are texts in Lojban lengthy?
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [lojban] CLL v1.1: Visual commentary, please.
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: [lojban] Are texts in Lojban lengthy?
  • From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Are texts in Lojban lengthy?
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: la durka <durka42@gmail.com>
• [lojban] datro
  • From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: CLL help: add jbovlaste words
  • From: la durka <durka42@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] CLL v1.1: Visual commentary, please.
  • From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
• [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] "Metalinguistic self-doubt"
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] CLL v1.1: Visual commentary, please.
  • From: Robert Slaughter <robert.s.slaughter@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: CLL v1.1: Visual commentary, please.
  • From: TR NS <transfire@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: CLL v1.1: Visual commentary, please.
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
• [lojban] Re: xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
• [lojban] Re: xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: la durka <durka42@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: "Metalinguistic self-doubt"
  • From: la durka <durka42@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: An attempt to explain why "ganai broda gi ko brode" makes sense
  • From: la durka <durka42@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Re: CLL v1.1: Visual commentary, please.
  • From: TR NS <transfire@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: jbobau vokta'a nu jmaji
  • From: Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Logic Terminology in Lojban
  • From: sorpa'as plat <sorpaas@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• [lojban] sko'opu definition and place structure
  • From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] sko'opu definition and place structure
  • From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
• Re: [lojban] sko'opu definition and place structure
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
  • From: Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>