[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Young ex-presidents and abandoned houses



selpa'i,

  You failed to mention one other workaround, using an almost-equivalent bridi for the tag -- citno ke purci  jatna

   (don't know why I chose  to respond to this email.  I"m still reading email from lasst January.  Xonsider yourself special)
                --gejyspa


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:43 AM, selpahi <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
Adjectival participles.

Lojban does not have them, but let's look at the known options for translating phrases such as "to be a young ex-president" and "to be an abandoned house". What these have in common is that they contain two tanru units, at least one of which wants to be preceded by a tense/aspect/modal. This is not grammatically possible, because tense/aspect/modal tags apply to entire selbri and not to tanru units, and they cannot appear in the middle of a tanru. The following work-arounds are known to be available:

1) BE: {citno jatna be ba'o ku}, {se cliva be ba'o ku zdadi'u}
2) POI'I: {citno poi'i [ke'a] ba'o jatna kei}, {poi'i [ke'a] ba'o se cliva kei zdadi'u}
3) ZEI: {citno ba'o-zei-jatna}, {ba'o-zei-selcliva zdadi'u}
4) lujvo, but this only works with a few tags
5) GU'E (and possibly {ke}): {gu'e citno gi ba'o jatna} (not allowed), {gu'e ba'o se cliva gi zdadi'u} (allowed)
6) ME LO: {citno me lo ba'o jatna}, {me lo ba'o se cliva poi [ke'a] zdadi'u} / {me lo ba'o se cliva me'u zdadi'u}

Option 1 is ugly to me because of the change in word order and the {ku}.
Option 2 is very flexible and very verbose and very complex (it increases the nesting by one level)
Option 3 is not practical when the tanru unit consists of more than one brivla (e.g. {se jai broda} or {na'e se broda}) as {zei} would then have to be placed between all the words.
Option 4 is not at all general.
Option 5 has potential but requires forethought, and {gu'e} also can claims too much, since it merges all the places, not just the x1 (just like {je}).
Option 6 needlessly involves a sumti, which seems backwards to me, because I believe that predicates should be the base case and sumti should be derived from them, and not vice versa.

If tag + tanru_unit yielded a tanru_unit instead of a selbri, then {(citno (ba'o jatna))} would be a valid tanru, as would {(ba'o se cliva (zdadi'u))}. However, this would require a lot more {cu} everywhere, specifically anywhere TAG was used in place of {cu} to close all the preceding constructs.

I am looking for practical solutions to this rather commonly encountered problem.

~~~mi'e la solpa'i

---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.