doi la .aionys.
.i ki'e u'ucru'e mi punai djuno fe la .byfy.
I must say I did not read enough through the various pages to reach that info.
Anyway, if you say the BPFK works as I described, then I feel it's good news. However:
- From afar, CLL seems a bit "stuck" at 1.1. Am I right? Do you think there would be some 1.x before 2.0 (ie. minor updates)?
- As I said on #ckule (IRC), it might be a good idea to write on the front page the version of the CLL and its release date ;-)
- Are some "betas" / "working branches" available (or will be available), so that people get a chance to have a look at before the official release?
- Do you have in mind any plausible releases dates? I'm not asking for a contractual thing, of course! Just to have a vague idea in mind.
Aside from that, and from my novice point of view, it seems that forks do exist and seem significant. Isn't it a signal, asking for more updates in the official CLL? Or do you feel that some people forking are simply impatient having their proposals integrated? What is your point of view?
.i ganai la .lojban. pe mi toldra gi e'o o'anai ko dragau
(I self-evaluate my Lojban level as being less than A1, as for
the CEFR. Please correct my Lojban if I'm wrong!)
Le lundi 6 novembre 2017 07:39:19 UTC+1, aionys a écrit :
That is literally what the BPFK is for. And CLL is the official Lojban, notwithstanding the very few proposals that have been accepted since it's publication.
The current CLL is mostly just an update to the original to make it easier to publish and use modern technologies to make it easy to update, plus fixing typographical and grammatical errors. (That's why it's called CLL v1.1, IIRC.)
Eventually, the CLL will be updated to include the changes since first publication, that project is known as CLL v2, and I'm certain Robin would love help with working on that.
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )