[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: CLL and modern Lojban



2017-11-21 22:25 GMT+03:00 Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>:


On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
Just note that PEG doesn't "resolve" parsing ambiguity in a common sense of this verb.


Not sure what you mean here, Gleki.
Given a PEG there can be only one parse tree for a string and this is what matters most.

Yes, and it does NOT resolve ambiguity.
Besides, it's simply another grammar that has its own drawbacks that were known to the first Lojbanists developing PEG grammar for Lojban, that were later forgotten.

People instead of doing work themselves like to authorize SomeoneElse to do it.

 
(Probably I mess what type of ambiguity you're referring to).


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lojban/e94H-wdh5gc/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.