[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Gismu in need of place structure extensions



Somewhat OT, but whatever:

lojbab:
[...] it changes the nature of the underlying relationship/predication.  To allow that would destroy one of the fundamental logical parts of the language, which is that even if a place is elided, it is still implicitly a part of the predication/relationship.

Which has just reminded me of why the problem (nabmi be mi) of connecting predicates with JE bugs me so much. Usage seems to disregard all non-explicit places in that very common kind of construction. Provocatively speaking, if we uphold 'one of the fundamental logical parts of the languages', super-common stuff like CLL 12.12 {ti blanu je zdani} is nonsense.

Yes, I brought this up before. (I still don't get it.) Sorry, please ignore here if inappropriate.

iesk

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lojban/8167ba74-6548-43e2-bc2b-7981a446a83fo%40googlegroups.com.