Re: [bpfk] Re: BPFK work

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I don't find anything wrong with the formatting, and I as well as
> several others have spent literally hours trying to update the
> formatting. =\

Do you actually use these pages as reference? when you need to find a
cmavo for some meaning or the meaning of some cmavo?   For the latter
there is jbovlaste, but what do you do when you know the selma'o you
need, but don't remember the exact word? If you don't use them, you
may not realize how difficult they are to read.

> Could you list, perhaps, some of the features or ideas behind the
> design that you would like?

Readability, mostly.

> Searchability is one, obviously.
> Anything else?
> Perhaps for UI we could have a special exception and list it on a
> grid?
>
>    'A  'E  'I  'O  'U   A   E   I   O   U
> A
> E
> I
> O
> U
>
> Maybe?

I'm happy with the current (non-standard) format for UI. Compare the
page for UI with one with the standard format, do you really not see a
difference in readability?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.