Re: xorxes' idea of UI, as interpreted (was Re: [bpfk] Re: The Case for UI.)

Subject: Re: xorxes' idea of UI, as interpreted (was Re: [bpfk] Re: The Case for UI.)

From: Theodore Reed <ted.reed@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:22:47 -0700

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=xlZTUoFNXywFwGiE0Kx/FJrfnTfwGzsEdsMZ0/8BNwE=; b=ANJ06BzqsUncEMBfpMx7DgVprCpOYsT/h+G+OCu7iSkT6AoRqGPHFlekWSy73piIoZ 8SBICiVSfCFzMJGxKTXj9JZXhTuv04gVBIyxr1CLEFmiHr+e7n/jbTZ1+uPTRBXvWMyJ jTDUbw4or7+Xse2ggXSHwuMwnyZuhuhwWmtjo=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=vn1M/d2nsb+hTivLyMIiapB3xJn9gbkgFqnv/ig3CwPDHue5kfw46Iz5+7ULxt42bD iKAuTncoXlYGuFA+LT665azUqvxm8oDKWQLH/gbUY3G4a2UlstShfRkh2sxNzoKdBDaX yxo269mr1oeZsZUmh/FaJ+v4BXfSIn7pHXXbM=

In-reply-to: <20100921185708.GB30871@digitalkingdom.org>

List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>

List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>

List-id: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>

List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>

List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>

List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>

Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com

References: <a91d86fd-dea4-486d-898f-bf852996488e@l32g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <AANLkTik8k5GXew1V0AL+S1UwjNvm3sz0DCRUighMXNu_@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikHDPSa+Zqi-ONoq4H0KqvX5oh0PeqjmENJAdun@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinOBZCJwc8VkQXj4+xrspZEByhd=nQbLWk5B3x=@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinU8-hFdPJFavjybBktdviH1XW=6OrjAQZYT=a=@mail.gmail.com> <2de88d23-c009-41e9-bb9c-86d1425b1b64@k1g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <-3659970292795760364@unknownmsgid> <20100921185708.GB30871@digitalkingdom.org>

Reply-to: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:57, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:

I'd like to hear other oldbies' opinions. Especially if xorxes and
xalbo actually agree with the phrasing above.

I was actually surprised to see this being referred to as xorxes' idea, because I had this idea independently and have been pushing it on IRC for a while.

References:

[bpfk] The Case for UI.
- From: Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com>
Re: [bpfk] The Case for UI.
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
Re: [bpfk] The Case for UI.
- From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
Re: [bpfk] The Case for UI.
- From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
Re: [bpfk] The Case for UI.
- From: purpleposeidon <purpleposeidon@gmail.com>
[bpfk] Re: The Case for UI.
- From: Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com>
Re: [bpfk] Re: The Case for UI.
- From: Daniel Brockman <dbrockman@gmail.com>
xorxes' idea of UI, as interpreted (was Re: [bpfk] Re: The Case for UI.)
- From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>