On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:57, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
It's a little bit like the whole "CAhA when unspecified is
undefined" thing, which is disturbing in that it means that any
sentence could be false-to-fact without declaring so, but the
principle of non-gluteality applies better in this case than in that
one.
Related to this, and to what xalbo said since, is this part of my fundamental understanding of Lojban: Everything, when unspecified, is undefined. If you want to define it, specify it. Otherwise, leave it to context. (And I fully expect that any remotely conversational Lojbanist will do just that, *often*.)
-- bancus