Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

2010/9/7 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> Sure. The entire reason behind me doing the reformatting is so that it's
> possible to see what work needs to be done, and I'm not touching any section
> that's grren, blue, or evil. (The best example of 'evil' being sumtcita
> Formants.)

Well, you touched a couple of my sections which are in black, that's
why I brought it up.

> That said, you might want to remind me when I get a bit closer. I'm going
> straight down the list, and UI are pretty far down, so I might forget.

Shouldn't you be doing red sections only? Black sections already have
someone assigned to them. (I'm not sure what the difference between
blue and black is. Blue are the ones worked on anonymously and black
are the ones that someone has claimed?)

mu'o mi'e xorxes

My understanding is, if it isn't green, it needs to be voted on, if it isn't blue, it needs work done to it, and if it isn't either, it needs both.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.