Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/9/7 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>>
>> Shouldn't you be doing red sections only? Black sections already have
>> someone assigned to them. (I'm not sure what the difference between
>> blue and black is. Blue are the ones worked on anonymously and black
>> are the ones that someone has claimed?)
>
> My understanding is, if it isn't green, it needs to be voted on, if it isn't
> blue, it needs work done to it, and if it isn't either, it needs both.

That's not what the instructions on the page say. They say that "blue"
is for completed community work. It doesn't say that completed
individual work has to be blue. Almost all of my sections are
completed and waiting to be checkpointed, but they are in black. At
the top of the page it says that you should feel free to work on _red_
sections, not black ones. But I don't really claim to fully understand
what the system is supposed to be. If people want to work on one of my
sections, I don't have a problem with that, but then please remove my
name as shepherd for the section.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.