[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] lololol whole section missing?

To: bpfk@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [bpfk] lololol whole section missing?
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:33:24 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :sender:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=APBzpZy7lJnw3Gr1u0CMosaJWke4731AISPd8oRAANc=; b=ASORwBvezloq9pXS/Uvx7N+fxiika1fK54HI9En00YVxCbW2z1DpL4NNjHJ0bW6Uf5 00ciR7FGXptycttZcESyCN6jIP9W01mz1kzhuSDsAkpbl20i35bV7c7vY2jN3Quxcflu OJ02aavdQlXGE7sIpx/wZ91OrVGsMnCDiHRp0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:sender:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; b=R0hks0lDtH8jCBasDcWkoCTNbhB52KCcS/GXCL48XhhF7ABxcOXPKq2VizPx4LvQdM fk0kO7bzsGkFUiSrLRLZjxCYiInjYU1+5pcIstmtoMhpdrM6qoFk5JJkQI3m0vvIRR7m Gyp/yGcK2d/Rmkk+toVygFNPPppt36FVBEujw=
In-reply-to: <20101225163743.GD29638@digitalkingdom.org>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <20101225162920.GA29638@digitalkingdom.org> <20101225163743.GD29638@digitalkingdom.org>
Reply-to: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

Robin Lee Powell scripsit:

> In case the implicit question wasn't obvious:  Should I put this
> back in?  Same with the other one.

Yes, please!  I can't imagine any reason to leave it out.

In addition, what is happening to Nora's indexing, represented here
by the cx pseudo-tag?  It's valuable and shouldn't just be discarded.

-- 
Don't be so humble.  You're not that great.             John Cowan
        --Golda Meir                                    cowan@ccil.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [bpfk] lololol whole section missing?
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

References:
- [bpfk] lololol whole section missing?
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- Re: [bpfk] lololol whole section missing?
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [bpfk] spa'i?
Next by Date: Re: [bpfk] lololol whole section missing?
Previous by thread: Re: [bpfk] lololol whole section missing?
Next by thread: Re: [bpfk] lololol whole section missing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread