Re: [bpfk] lololol whole section missing?

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 02:33:24PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
> 
> > In case the implicit question wasn't obvious:  Should I put this
> > back in?  Same with the other one.
> 
> Yes, please!  I can't imagine any reason to leave it out.
> 
> In addition, what is happening to Nora's indexing, represented
> here by the cx pseudo-tag?  It's valuable and shouldn't just be
> discarded.

Oh yes!  It was never my intention to discard it at all.

Earlier I used the raw text index to partially index the document,
but that left a lot of manual labour.  If people have time to read
the "TODO" instructions on the indexing, and guesstimate the
*amount* of labour, that'd be of some help to me.

I'm working on a script to add the indexing back in automatically.
It is *very* complicated; I think I've spent more than a dozen hours
on it already.  I'd like reassurance that I'm saving time doing it
that way, overall.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.