Re: [bpfk] lololol whole section missing?

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:43:02AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 02:33:24PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> > Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
> > 
> > > In case the implicit question wasn't obvious:  Should I put
> > > this back in?  Same with the other one.
> > 
> > Yes, please!  I can't imagine any reason to leave it out.
> > 
> > In addition, what is happening to Nora's indexing, represented
> > here by the cx pseudo-tag?  It's valuable and shouldn't just be
> > discarded.
> 
> Oh yes!  It was never my intention to discard it at all.

In fact, it was the thrice-damned index insertion script that caught
these problems.  It fuzzily matches paragraphs between (the catdoc
output of) the .doc version and dag-cll/docbook.  It couldn't find a
match, so...

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.