Re: [bpfk] Should *every* use of every lojban word be cross-referenced?

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 07:20:30PM -0800, Zort wrote:
> The question came up when I asked Robin whether I could remove the
> indexterm in:
> 
> <para> <indexterm type="lojban-word-imported"><primary>coi</primary></
> indexterm> FIXME: TAG SPOT</para>
>     <example role="interlinear-gloss-example" xml:id="example-random-
> id-Bega">
>       <title>
>         <anchor xml:id="c6e11d3"/>
>       </title>
>       <interlinear-gloss>
>         <jbo>coi. djan.</jbo>
>         <en>Hello, John.</en>
>       </interlinear-gloss>
>     </example>
> 
> even though the corresponding Lojban word isn't wrapped in a
> <jbophrase> specifically (the TODO says to remove these types of
> indexterms when there is such a wrapped Lojban word nearby).
> 
> Me: Dunno, can't we just mark every single indextermed word, then
> later if we feel like it tell the computer to not indexize the
> ones that are in <jbo>s?

I've changed the way this is handled; only <valsi> actually causes
automatic indexterm links.  Whether you choose to wrap something in
<valsi>, leave in an explicit indexterm, or drop both because that
particular use of "coi" isn't important, is basically a style
decision; I'm not terribly worried about it.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.