[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] Re: {.i} and {ni'o}, continuation or new jufra



On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is where the misunderstanding lies. I'm not talking about treating
> everything everyone says as though a single speaker said the entirety. I'm
> talking about whether or not to treat something said by one person and
> something said by another person as a single jufra, which means to me, the
> bit between two consecutive, non-quoted [I]'s.

You understand that with the current official grammar, that doesn't work, right?

A: .i ie pei xamgu
B: nai .i na xamgu

The bit between the two consecutive, non-quoted [I]'s is not
grammatical. In at least that one example B's text must be taken as a
separate text.

> {.i lo broda cu brode lu .i broda lo brodi li'u .i li'o} is a sinlge jufra
> followed by one or more omitted jufra, as indicated by {li'o}.

Syntactically, "li'o" is not a jufra, it just attaches to ".i", but
I'm not sure how this has to do with anything anyway.

> {la.alis.} is a single text. It is composed of a large multitude of jufra.

Yes course, with a single speaker/author, Lewis Carrol.

(Strictly speaking, it won't completely parse with the current
grammar, but the breaking points are very few. In principle it could
have been a single text, yes. It is not a conversation where texts are
exchanged between two or more peoiple.)

> These are not the same things.

I really don't know what you're saying with that. We are considering
conversations, i.e. (in my understanding) exchange of texts between
different speakers, not something like a book which is one long text
by one speaker/author.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.