Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

2010/10/12 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se> wrote:
> Okay, for the sake of argument, if we treat this
>
>    A: do klama ma
>    B: lo zarci
>
> as an informal Lojban meta-textual object, while at the same
> time declare this to be a well-defined Lojban "conversation",
>
>    do klama ma fa'ai lo zarci
>
> then what do we do about this?
>
>   la xorxes cu cusku lu do klama ma fa'ai lo zarci
>
> That's one "conversation", but is it one or two "texts"?

That will depend on whether "lu" can quote whole conversations or just
texts, like now. If just texts, then the elidable "li'u" will
automatically be inserted before "fa'ai".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

As far as I'm concerned, that's just a really good reason to never elide {li'u}, which both .xorxes. and I frown upon.
 

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.