Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Also, if you remember, my pragmatic decision as to whether a new speaker = a
> new text is determined by whether the new speaker begins with {.i} or
> {ni'o}, i.e. it is a continuation if not, and a next text if so.,

What does that buy you? What advantage do you see in treating the
utterances produced by different speakers in a conversation as if they
were a single text?

I see the disadvantages (you lose the information that a text has a
speaker which is referred to as "mi" in the text and an audience which
is referred to as "do" in the text), but I still can't see the
advantages. What are the advantages of treating the whole conversation
as one text?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.