Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
> Jorge Llambías wrote:
>>
>> A:  ie pei melbi donri
>> B:  nai
>
> Obviously then I would have to "explain" the text as "ungrammatical".  %^)
>
> It doesn't parse as it is, and the machine grammar doesn't recognize the
> possibility of multiple texts of that sort.

So you think that conversation is invalid Lojban? Wow.

> As B, I would feel obliged to use ".ienai go'i" if I wanted it to be
> "correct" Lojban, though I guess just "ienai" would work just as well in
> this instance. (If CLL has the above as an example, of course, I just say
> "we didn't think about that when John wrote it")

I didn't check if it has the exact example, but "nai" is a valid text.
What do you think it's for?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.