Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
>
> The problem I thought was being discussed was how to identify something as
> syntactically part of someone else's text.

You seemed to be arguing that that was the case by default, and you
needed a FAhO to break that default, which is contrary to everything I
have ever learned about Lojban.

Let me put it this way:

A:  (something that parses correctly on its own)
B:  (something that parses correctly on its own)

My default assumption is that what A said is one text, and what B said
is another text. In some special cases, B may be adding something to
A's text, but normally they are just responding to A's text with their
own new text.

That's the Lojban I have learned starting from your lessons. Is that
not your current understanding too?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.