Re: [bpfk] BAhE + BU

[John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>]

Alex Burka scripsit:

> And the language in "Nonce connectives" should definitely be unified --
> either we say {ba'e} and {za'e} both "bind" with the following word,
> or neither of them do, plus the definition for {za'e} has points about
> {sa} and left-to-right magic word resolution that should be in both
> definitions assuming they are correct.

On reflection I was wrong to say ba'e is not at all magic; it is semi-magic
like UI and COI words.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
I now introduce Professor Smullyan, who will prove to you that either
he doesn't exist or you don't exist, but you won't know which.
                               --Melvin Fitting

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.