Re: [bpfk] Type-3 fu'ivla

[Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>]

On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 23:18:08 Alex Burka wrote:
> Given that type-3 fu'ivla are pretty much a convention anyway, these seem
> reasonable to me, especially #1. I don't see a big problem with so-called
> "type-3.5 fu'ivla" such as {djarspageti} or {sparfaiu}. And I guess
> {xoxrbeba} would be type 4, technically.

Are you contradicting yourself or disagreeing with me? In #2, I'm proposing 
that whether a fu'ivla is type-3 or type-4 be determined purely 
morphologically, ignoring whether the rafsi in the type-3 actually belongs to 
any gismu. Thus "xoxrbeba" is type-3, just as "bakrkobu" is type-3.

Pierre
-- 
The Black Garden on the Mountain is not on the Black Mountain.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.