Re: [bpfk] Improvements to fragments in ilmentufa parser

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

There was a bug when editing this string:

fragment = expr:(ek free* / !term !tag quantifier / relative_clauses / links / linkargs) {return _node("fragment", expr);}

{reroi} is indeed parseable.

ui .o'u bu'o .i mi na pu jimpe lo du'u ma kau navmi 

I thought you used your tool to test your copy of PEG.

na .i mi na tolcau lo fukpi be PEG

 

But if we stick to this camxes-exp.js.peg then I can only suggest that I create a web tool where you input this _javascript_ PEG, press "compile" and then get a working parser. Do you need it? Will it accelerate the development?

 simlu lo ka xamgu sidbo

ki'e mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.