Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Improvements to fragments in ilmentufa parser
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Improvements to fragments in ilmentufa parser
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Improvements to fragments in ilmentufa parser
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] On shutting down English in camxes
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Improvements to fragments in ilmentufa parser
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Improvements to fragments in ilmentufa parser
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] On shutting down English in camxes
  • From: Alex Burka <aburka@seas.upenn.edu>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] On shutting down English in camxes
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] On shutting down English in camxes
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] Re: Postpositions
  • From: la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Postpositions
  • From: Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] Does Lojban PEG need a "naughty OR" operator?
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Does Lojban PEG need a "naughty OR" operator?
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Does Lojban PEG need a "naughty OR" operator?
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] A quick tool to test PEG for polite people.
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] Re: A quick tool to test PEG for polite people.
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: A quick tool to test PEG for polite people.
  • From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: A quick tool to test PEG for polite people.
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: A quick tool to test PEG for polite people.
  • From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: A quick tool to test PEG for polite people.
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG
  • From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG
  • From: cowan@ccil.org
• [bpfk] FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG)
  • From: Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG)
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] Re: FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG)
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] Re: te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Alex Burka <aburka@seas.upenn.edu>
• Re: [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Proposal: sumti must always be tagged with "tag" even if it's elidible.
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG)
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG)
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] Re: te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] "bridi_tail = ... bridi_tail" is wrong imo
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] "bridi_tail = ... bridi_tail" is wrong imo
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG)
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] Re: official cmavo form
  • From: mukti <shunpiker@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG)
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: official cmavo form
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] Why recursion in BE?
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: official cmavo form
  • From: mukti <shunpiker@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: official cmavo form
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: official cmavo form
  • From: mukti <shunpiker@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] Several nested giheks in bridi tail in PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Several nested giheks in bridi tail in PEG
  • From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG)
  • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG)
  • From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] FA-autorestoration rules
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] Re: FA-autorestoration rules
  • From: la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] On shutting down English in camxes
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
• [bpfk] Type-3 fu'ivla
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
• Re: [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Type-3 fu'ivla
  • From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>
• [bpfk] JVS limitations on entering word combinations impede Lojban development
  • From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: official cmavo form
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
• Re: [bpfk] Re: official cmavo form
  • From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>