[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bpfk] Month Names (WAS: official cmavo form)
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Gleki Arxokuna
<gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2015-01-17 0:59 GMT+03:00 Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com>:
>>
>> .janu'ári'us. .febru'ári'us. .márti'us. .aprílis. .máius. (ja .május.)
>> .júni'us. .júli'us. .augústus. .septémber. .október. .novémber.
>> .decémber.
>
>
> How would you say "Every February" using these?
{[ca] ro la .febru'ári'us.}
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Gleki Arxokuna
>> <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > 2015-01-16 16:47 GMT+03:00 Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>:
>> >>
>> >> "madjio" is from Italian.
>> >
>> >
>> > And that's what I don't like. I suppose names should follow some system,
>> > not
>> > be arbitrarily taken from different languages within one set of words
>> > (then
>> > why not Lojbanize Italian "gennaio" and so on?).
>>
>> Most likely he used Italian simply because the Latin for "May" namely
>> "maius/maio-" is insufficiently crunchy for brivla. IMO Latin would
>> be the right language to Lojbanize here. But, it seems impossible to
>> import the full Latin month names recognizably into fu'ivla space. So
>> maybe the suffix idea is the way to go...
>>
>> janmese febmese marmese prilmese magmese junmese julmese
>
>
> ke'u, jun- and jul- are too close and can be easily mixed together.
Do you find {lo} and {no} to be easy to mix together too, or is the
issue specifically [n]/[l] after a vowel? The Romans and the heirs of
their language had no problem with this, mind you; Junius/Julius are
pronounced exactly the same way in all forms except for the one
segment in question. By the way, this concerns a third set of
Lojbanic month names; I was thinking that the main purpose of having
this set at all was to match the Latinate forms as much as possible;
otherwise, what's the point. My revised suggestion:
janvari febvari martime prilme magjome junxame julzeme .avgusto
septebe .oktobe novmebe dekmere
IMHO these work as recognizable loans (barely) if you squint a bit (or
a lot), but I still prefer the relative fidelity of cmene form,
especially if cmevla and brivla are intended to be syntactically
merged some day.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.