On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <
gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > How would you say "Every February" using these?
>>
>> {[ca] ro la .febru'ári'us.}
>
> nalkemgendra
The only problem that I see in la_jbofi'e is {á}, which can be changed to {A}. Sorry if that caused an issue.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 8:44 AM, selpa'i <
seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> *{prilme} is a slinku'i.
je'e galfi lo mi cipra liste lu
janvari febvari martime prilime magjome junxame julzeme .avgusto septebe .oktobe novmebe dekmere
li'u
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:49 AM, John Cowan <
cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Mike S. scripsit:
>
>> {[ca] ro la .febru'ári'us.}
>
> That means "everything named 'February'". Unfortunately, there are Aprils
> that are not months but women.
This
seems contrary to what both the CLL and the BPFK say about {la}. CLL 6.2
says 'Like ``le'' descriptions, ``la'' descriptions are implicitly
restricted to those I have in mind.' and 6.7 goes on to specify the
implicit {la} quantifiers as 'ro la su'o' -- 'all of the at least one named'. I would think from this that an outer {ro} would quantify strictly over the speaker's in-mind referents.