Re: [bpfk] polysemy of {nai}

[John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>]

Daniel Brockman scripsit:

> Jorge's original claim though was that {mi na klama le zarci} is
> equivalent to {na'e klama be fa mi bei le zarci}.

Yes, which I deny.  There are situations compatible with the first
that are not compatible with the second.

-- 
A few times, I did some exuberant stomping about,       John Cowan
like a hippo auditioning for Riverdance, though         cowan@ccil.org
I stopped when I thought I heard something at           http://ccil.org/~cowan
the far side of the room falling over in rhythm
with my feet.  --Joseph Zitt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.