2. {lo zmiku cu na [ja'e] xendo}={lo zmiku cu na na'e xendo}={lo zmiku cu na to'e xendo} is a true statement. The scale is denied.
However, not taking into account the lack of the truth value in {na'i} the second example is the same to me as
3. {lo zmiku cu xendo na'i}
On Sunday, December 9, 2012 6:53:00 AM UTC+4, John Cowan wrote:
Daniel Brockman scripsit:
> Jorge's original claim though was that {mi na klama le zarci} is
> equivalent to {na'e klama be fa mi bei le zarci}.
Yes, which I deny. There are situations compatible with the first
that are not compatible with the second.
--
A few times, I did some exuberant stomping about, John Cowan
like a hippo auditioning for Riverdance, though co...@ccil.org
I stopped when I thought I heard something at http://ccil.org/~cowan
the far side of the room falling over in rhythm
with my feet. --Joseph Zitt