Re: [bpfk] polysemy of {nai}

[Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>]

On Sunday, December 09, 2012 04:07:48 la gleki wrote:
> 1. {lo zmiku cu na'e xendo} is a false statement. Robots can't be
> kind/unkind or in the middle of that scale. The scale just cannot be
> applied.
> 2. {lo zmiku cu na [ja'e] xendo}={lo zmiku cu na na'e xendo}={lo zmiku cu
> na to'e xendo} is a true statement. The scale is denied.

lo bifce be la .sfeks. zmiku so'i se tarti .i xu lo bifce be la .sfeks. xendo 
lo panzi be ri

Which brings up another question. Does "ri" refer to "lo bifce be la .sfeks." 
(which is what I meant) or "la .sfeks."? I think it refers to the last finished 
sumti which is not a personal pronoun, but these two sumti finish at the same 
point in text.

Pierre
-- 
I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.